Apple and Google Lose EU Appeals, Ordered to Pay Billions in Fines

apple google eu antitrust fines

In a landmark decision on Tuesday, Apple and Google both suffered significant legal setbacks in their ongoing antitrust battles with the European Union. The EU’s highest court upheld rulings requiring the two tech giants to face massive fines, marking a significant victory for European regulators who have long been at the forefront of efforts to rein in the dominance of Big Tech.

These rulings underscore the increasing pressure that companies like Apple and Google face from regulators not only in Europe but across the globe. The rulings serve as a bold statement that the EU is serious about holding these companies accountable for their business practices, and these fines could potentially reshape the way both companies operate, particularly in Europe.

Apple Ordered to Repay €13 Billion in Tax Breaks

The Court of Justice of the European Union upheld a 2016 European Commission decision that found Ireland had improperly granted Apple tax breaks totaling 13 billion euros, or roughly $14.4 billion, over a period of more than two decades. The case centered around Ireland’s corporate tax arrangements with Apple, which the European Commission deemed to be illegal state aid.

The European Commission, led by Margrethe Vestager, argued that Apple had been allowed to pay substantially less in taxes than other businesses, thereby gaining an unfair advantage. According to the Commission’s findings, Apple’s effective corporate tax rate in Ireland had dropped to as low as 0.005% in some years. This arrangement allowed Apple to book much of its European profits through its Irish subsidiaries, even though the company sells its products and services across the continent.

In 2016, the Commission ordered Apple to repay the 13 billion euros in unpaid taxes to Ireland. However, in 2020, a lower EU court overturned the Commission’s ruling, stating that the evidence presented did not conclusively prove that Apple received a selective economic advantage. The recent decision by the Court of Justice now reverses that lower court’s ruling, upholding the original €13 billion penalty.

Margrethe Vestager celebrated the ruling, taking to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to express her satisfaction. “Today is a huge win for European citizens and tax justice,” Vestager wrote. She has been a vocal advocate for holding large tech companies accountable for tax avoidance and anti-competitive practices and sees this ruling as a major triumph in her ongoing campaign to promote fairness within the digital economy.

The ruling also sends a strong message to multinational corporations regarding the importance of paying their fair share of taxes in the countries where they operate. While Apple has yet to comment on the ruling, the company has previously argued that it complied with all applicable tax laws and that the tax arrangement with Ireland was legitimate. Apple had warned that forcing the company to repay the taxes could harm its operations in Europe.

Ireland has also been involved in the case, as it stands to benefit from the significant repayment. However, Ireland had opposed the Commission’s decision, fearing that it would deter future foreign investment in the country, which has long used its low corporate tax rates to attract multinational companies. The latest ruling is likely to reignite debate over Ireland’s tax policies and the broader issue of tax competition within the EU.

Google’s €2.4 Billion Fine for Antitrust Violations Upheld

In a separate but equally significant case, the Court of Justice of the European Union upheld a €2.4 billion fine against Google, imposed by the European Commission in 2017. The fine was originally levied after the Commission found that Google had abused its dominance in the search engine market by favoring its own comparison shopping service over those of its competitors.

The case dates back to 2010 when the European Commission began investigating complaints from other shopping services, which claimed that Google was using its dominant position to give its own service preferential treatment in search results. According to the Commission’s findings, Google had systematically placed its comparison shopping service at the top of its search results while demoting those of its rivals. This practice, the Commission argued, stifled competition and prevented consumers from seeing the best offers available.

The Commission’s investigation culminated in a 2017 ruling, in which Google was fined €2.4 billion and ordered to stop its anti-competitive practices. The fine was one of the largest ever imposed by the European Commission and marked a significant step in the EU’s efforts to regulate Big Tech companies.

In the years following the Commission’s ruling, Google made several changes to its shopping service, aiming to comply with the EU’s regulations. The company implemented new features that allowed rival comparison shopping services to bid for placement in Google’s search results, theoretically giving them a fairer chance to compete. However, critics argued that these changes were not enough to address the underlying issues of Google’s market dominance.

Tuesday’s ruling by the EU’s highest court represents a major victory for the European Commission and Margrethe Vestager, who has been at the forefront of the EU’s antitrust efforts. Vestager hailed the ruling as a “big win for digital fairness,” stating that it reinforces the EU’s commitment to ensuring fair competition in the digital market. The ruling also sets a precedent for how the EU will handle future cases involving tech giants and their market behavior.

A Google spokesperson expressed disappointment with the court’s decision but noted that the company had taken steps to comply with the Commission’s original ruling. “We’re disappointed with the decision, but our approach has worked successfully for more than seven years, generating billions of clicks for more than 800 comparison shopping services,” the spokesperson said. Despite this statement, the ruling is likely to prompt further scrutiny of Google’s practices in Europe and beyond.

Implications for Big Tech: Increasing Regulatory Pressure

The decisions against Apple and Google come at a time when tech giants are facing unprecedented scrutiny from regulators in both Europe and the United States. In the U.S., Google is currently facing its own legal challenges, with a judge recently ruling that the company illegally maintained a monopoly over online search services. Additionally, a second antitrust trial against Google over its dominance in the digital advertising market began in Virginia just one day before the EU’s rulings were handed down.

The growing pressure on Big Tech reflects broader concerns about the power and influence that companies like Apple and Google wield in the global economy. Regulators are increasingly worried that these companies are using their dominant positions to stifle competition, limit consumer choice, and avoid paying their fair share of taxes. These concerns are prompting a wave of new antitrust investigations and legal challenges aimed at curbing the influence of these tech giants.

For Apple and Google, the EU’s rulings represent significant setbacks, both financially and reputationally. Apple’s €13 billion tax bill is one of the largest corporate tax penalties in history, while Google’s €2.4 billion antitrust fine underscores the EU’s commitment to enforcing competition laws in the digital age. Both companies will likely continue to face legal battles in the coming years as regulators in Europe, the U.S., and other regions ramp up their efforts to hold Big Tech accountable.

What’s Next?

The rulings are unlikely to be the final word in these cases, as both Apple and Google may explore further legal options or seek to negotiate settlements with regulators. However, the decisions are a clear indication that the European Union is serious about regulating the activities of Big Tech companies, and they send a strong message to other multinational corporations that they will not be immune from scrutiny.

As the legal and regulatory landscape continues to evolve, it will be crucial for tech companies to adapt to the changing expectations of governments and consumers. Whether through new business practices, changes in corporate governance, or greater transparency, the pressure is on for companies like Apple and Google to demonstrate that they are operating fairly and responsibly in an increasingly regulated world.

For now, Apple and Google will have to grapple with the immediate financial and operational consequences of these rulings, as well as the broader implications for their long-term strategies in Europe and beyond. As Margrethe Vestager and other regulators continue their campaigns to promote fairness and accountability in the digital economy, the future of Big Tech is likely to be shaped by these landmark decisions.


Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Related Articles

Top Trending

best free SaaS tools
Work, Wealth, And Wellness: 50 Best Free SAAS Tools to Optimize Your Life in 2026
India-EU Trade Deal and China
China’s Invisible Hand in the India-EU Trade Deal
Side Hustles to Avoid
5 Popular Side Hustles That Are A Complete Waste of Time in 2026
Digital Drop-Servicing is the King of 2026
Forget Dropshipping: Why "Digital Drop-Servicing" Is The King Of 2026
Is Monster Hunter Wilds Open World
Is Monster Hunter Wilds An Open World Game? The Map & Regions Explained

Fintech & Finance

high yield savings accounts in January 2026
Top 5 High-Yield Savings Accounts (HYSA) for January 2026
What Is Teen Banking
What Is Teen Banking: The Race To Capture The Gen Alpha Market [The Next Big Thing]
How to Conduct a SaaS Audit Cutting Bloat in Q1 2026
How To Conduct A SaaS Audit: Cutting Bloat In Q1 2026
The Evolution of DAOs Are They Replacing Corporations
The Evolution Of DAOs: Are They Replacing Corporations?
How Regular Credit Score Tracking with Bajaj Markets Helps Prevent Loan Rejection
How Regular Credit Score Tracking with Bajaj Markets Helps Prevent Loan Rejection

Sustainability & Living

What Is The Sharing Economy
What Is The Sharing Economy: Borrowing Tools Instead Of Buying [Save Big]
Net-Zero Buildings
Net-Zero Buildings: How To Achieve Zero Emissions [The Ultimate Pathway to a Greener Future]
Fusion Energy
Fusion Energy: Updates on the Holy Grail of Power [Revisiting The Perspective]
Tiny homes
Tiny Homes: A Solution to Homelessness or Poverty with Better Branding?
Smart Windows The Tech Saving Energy in 2026 Skyscrapers
Smart Windows: The Tech Saving Energy in 2026 Skyscrapers

GAMING

Is Monster Hunter Wilds Open World
Is Monster Hunter Wilds An Open World Game? The Map & Regions Explained
Monster Hunter Wilds Story Length
How Many Chapters Are In Monster Hunter Wilds? Story Length Guide
steam deck alternatives in 2026
Top 5 Handheld Consoles to Buy in 2026 (That Aren't the Steam Deck)
Game Preservation in the Digital Age What Happens When Servers Die
Game Preservation In The Digital Age: What Happens When Servers Die?
How Many Chapters in Monster Hunter Wilds
How Many Chapters in Monster Hunter Wilds: Breakdown of All 6 Story Chapters

Business & Marketing

Side Hustles to Avoid
5 Popular Side Hustles That Are A Complete Waste of Time in 2026
Digital Drop-Servicing is the King of 2026
Forget Dropshipping: Why "Digital Drop-Servicing" Is The King Of 2026
How To Sell Notion Templates
Write Once, Sell Forever: How To Sell Notion Templates In 2026 [Profit Blueprint]
10 Side Hustles You Can Start This Weekend with $0 and a Laptop
10 Side Hustles You Can Start This Weekend with $0 and a Laptop
7 AI-First Side Hustles That Didn't Exist 6 Months Ago
7 "AI-First" Side Hustles That Didn't Exist 6 Months Ago

Technology & AI

best free SaaS tools
Work, Wealth, And Wellness: 50 Best Free SAAS Tools to Optimize Your Life in 2026
Why Local SaaS Hosting Matters More Than Ever
Data Sovereignty: Why Local SaaS Hosting Matters More Than Ever
Prompt Engineering Is Dead Here Are the 4 Tech Skills Actually Paying
Prompt Engineering Is Dead: Here Are the 4 Tech Skills Actually Paying in 2026
high income skills
Stop Driving Uber: 5 High-Paying Digital Skills You Can Learn in a Weekend
7 AI-First Side Hustles That Didn't Exist 6 Months Ago
7 "AI-First" Side Hustles That Didn't Exist 6 Months Ago

Fitness & Wellness

Mental Health First Aid for Managers
Mental Health First Aid: A Mandatory Skill for 2026 Managers
The Quiet Wellness Movement Reclaiming Mental Focus in the Hyper-Digital Era
The “Quiet Wellness” Movement: Reclaiming Mental Focus in the Hyper-Digital Era
Cognitive Optimization
Brain Health is the New Weight Loss: The Rise of Cognitive Optimization
The Analogue January Trend Why Gen Z is Ditching Screens for 30 Days
The "Analogue January" Trend: Why Gen Z is Ditching Screens for 30 Days
Gut Health Revolution The Smart Probiotic Tech Winning CES
Gut Health Revolution: The "Smart Probiotic" Tech Winning CES